Recordings beyond what is permitted by the Guidelines may be permitted for programs broadcast on PBS (Public Broadcasting System) channels. The producers of many PBS programs allow educational institutions to record their off-air programs and show them for more than ten days, sometimes for years. This does not apply to all PBS programs, and the scope of authorized use varies from program to program. Contact the Education or Utility Coordinator at your local PBS station for information on the policies of a particular PBS program. Of course, this is just my personal feeling of what justice is in recording and copying. Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by allowing the unlicensed use of copyrighted works in certain circumstances. See www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html You can legally record a TV program on a recording device such as a VCR, DVR, or computer for your personal use. The recording of programmes for future viewing is called “time lag” and is a legally supported act. You can view the recorded content as many times as you like, make additional copies of the recorded content, and distribute copies of the content personally to others. The educational use of recorded television content is also protected. It is legal to record a TV show and play it for a class.
You may not hold public exhibitions, rebroadcast them, distribute them on peer-to-peer networks, or sell a television recording. Fair dealing does not protect the mass distribution of recorded content or an individual`s ability to make money from a copyrighted recording. Under the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the legal definition of “tangible” has been refined to protect digital copies of works from copyright infringement and unauthorized use online. This includes everything from e-books, art, games and software to music and movies. There are some exceptions to the rules. Section 107 of the Copyright Act permits the recording and reproduction of copyrighted films and television programs for personal, non-commercial reasons. You can record video files as long as you don`t distribute them and sell them in the public domain. As online infringement of copyrighted videos and music increases, it`s important to know what`s allowed under U.S. law and what`s not. An original work is automatically protected by copyright if it is “fixed in a tangible sense of expression”.
The term “tangible” may have made more sense in the days when VHS and DVDs were a thing, but what about an easily accessible “pirate” website that appears legal? However, it`s a big technical hurdle, and it means you should have OTA recording systems physically in all markets (that`s essentially what cable companies do, and they pay a fee and then send local OTA content only to the market that can get it). But according to the court`s current ruling, you can`t rebroadcast the same show nationally, and you have to be a “cable system.” Note that Article 20 requires remuneration from producers of blank recording media (sinusoidal recordings are legal, but not entirely without compensation to the right holder). @anon26783, Post 4: This is absurd. It`s like saying it`s legal to buy drugs but not to sell them. Penalties under the law for copyright infringement range from $200 to $150,000 for each work infringed. While this is the case, the issue of liability has remained highly controversial since the rise and fall of file-sharing platforms such as Napster and Limewire. Given the ease with which videos can be copied and reproduced, many teachers need to know if and when they can legally record educational TV shows outside of broadcast and show them to their students. “Fair dealing is any copying of copyrighted material for a limited purpose and `transformative,`” according to the Stanford University Libraries Copyright Reference.
The main function of fair use is to protect people`s ability to comment on and criticize copyrighted works. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that fair dealing rules legally tolerate people who record live television shows. Television download technology – legal or otherwise – is widely used, and the sale of devices that allow digital recordings has not been banned. Digital video recorders (DVRs) allow users to record and store TV shows, and some even allow them to be transferred to a computer or burned to a DVD. These devices can also allow the user to pause live TV and skip commercials for recorded programs at the touch of a button. At least in the United States, DVRs enjoy the same protection as VCRs, with the user agreeing not to distribute commercially recorded material and to perform all displays in a private home. Some people like me live in countries that don`t have American TV shows on their channels, and so-called internet streaming sites are often unavailable and when they are, they often have bad streams and are simply unbearable to watch. Downloading my shows via P2P is my only option, other than paying exorbitant prices to buy them in DVD season sets when other people get them directly on their TVs in the US for free. I pay for HBO and can set up my DVR to record True Blood, for example.
So what`s the difference if I upload it to the web and save myself a few steps to transfer it to the format in which I can use it on a fair dealing basis? I would pay for them if the cost was reasonable, because I`m pretty addicted to some of these shows and either they haven`t been on free TV for many years (they`re on pay TV, but I don`t have any or don`t want to), or they`re not airing at all. The decision to hold home recorder manufacturers and dealers liable for the damage could deal a devastating blow to the billion-dollar new industry if it goes ahead. However, it is not expected to have immediate effect, as any ban on house arrest is likely to be delayed until the Supreme Court has ruled on the matter. An amicable settlement or amendment of copyright law is also possible. If you are a teacher, you need to know if and when you can legally record educational TV shows and use them in your classroom. Copyright laws aren`t always covered by technology, so it`s usually hard to tell if you can legally download TV shows for any purpose. Some legal analysts suggest that consumers who do so are clearly violating existing copyright laws. Others equate this practice with video recordings or digital recordings of broadcasts for later personal viewing. Currently, the most common methods of downloading programs are very similar to file-sharing systems that are already being challenged in courts around the world. There are also legal ways to download TV, usually by purchasing individual episodes or entire seasons from a company that has the right to redistribute the programs. to – Anon59061.
The difference between renting or giving a movie to a friend and sharing it digitally with friends over the internet is this: if you loan/give your DVD to a friend, it`s just a DVD. You are not both in possession of the film. When you share digitally on a network, you reproduce the media, and that`s where legality is questioned. There are many ways to see people posting a copyright, for example; in which people finally manage to post videos by recording an episode or TV series that makes it legal, like posting on YouTube, and you can`t delete it right away, and it`s still on the copyright notice page. There is also the issue of copyright, which is supposed to establish legal ownership of the show as a creative work. Whoever owns the copyright to the program has the right not only to make money from the program, but also to reproduce and transmit it. If someone copies a program and makes digital copies available without the owner`s consent, they are usually infringing copyright. While both software companies have lost their legal battles against the record industry because they indirectly contributed to illegal file-sharing, it remains to be debated whether the user can escape the responsibility of downloading content for free.
With hundreds of thousands of music fans downloading audio copies from these sites in the early 2000s, the lure of free music turned ordinary people into hackers and thieves seemingly overnight. The guidelines do not cover many common situations. For example, they say nothing about the legality of keeping a recorded program for more than ten days or recording a cable or streaming channel offer. At least in the US, it`s legal to use a DVR to download TV shows for private playback. For copyright reasons, it may be illegal to download programs from a source that has not been authorized by the legitimate owners of those programs to distribute that content. A person can legally download television programs offered through authorized authorized services authorized by the owners. Most major broadcast networks in the United States now also have websites that broadcast selected episodes of shows to viewers. Of course, fear of being caught is not the only reason to obey the law. Schools have a special responsibility to set an example of obedience to the law. And from a purely practical point of view, schools are an important market for producers of documentaries and other educational works.
If, instead of buying copies of a program, schools simply recorded a television program and made as many copies of it as they wanted, producers would lose money and be less likely to create new educational works. Lachenbruch, who is considered an expert on the nascent videotape industry, predicted that the two sides would eventually reach an agreement that would not seriously affect sales. In the future, he said, film production companies like Universal could “make more videos than theaters.” It would also clarify the legal issue of content that is not available in your region (in any way), as there would be no legal way.